Mike Jones – Wales Cooperative Centre

Mike Jones of the Wales Cooperative Centre does not know what my organisation’s activities are because he haven’t seen the business plan we are working on, so shouldn’t be sending me emails saying about its prospects.

At the end of the day Mike Jones of the Wales Cooperative Centre is in a job he lacks the abilities and capacity to do and I look forward to Brexit cleaning lazy people like Mike Jones out of the closet.

Social Business Wales was set up to bring social enterprises in line with Welsh Government policies. Mike Jones is not doing that so should be fired for someone who has the competence to use tax payers money properly.

Mike Jones of the Wales Cooperative Centre cannot tell me my business is not high growth, as Mike Jones is not qualified to. I and my family are far more successful than Mike Jones of the Wales Cooperative Centre..

Those who work for me are icons of workfullness, whereas Mike Jones of the Wales Cooperative Centre embodies laziness.

Racism on Pentyrch Community Council

I applied to be co-opted to Pentyrch Community Council. The Localism Act 2011 requires that those who are co-opted to a community council meet the criteria while they are a member. It is the responsibility of the person concerned to know their eligibility. There were three vacancies. Two said they were from Creigiau and the Chair made known I was from Efail Isaf. Whilst I confirmed I was eligible – being within three miles, the chairman as that this be confirmed. Under the council’s rules candidates have to be treated equally. Therefore the other candidates should have had their eligibility checked also, as the Localism Act 2011 rules could have meant they were not eligible if they had not lived in the area for 12 months, were not on the electoral register, or any of the other criteria. They gave reasons for wanted to be co-opted and were accepted, whereas mine was deferred to the next month. When I gave the same reasons as them at the next meeting the chairman shouted me down. He then had other members ask me questions that were not asked of the other candidates. I was thus not treated equally. I thus believe this amounts to racism because I was treated less favourably than the other two candidates because their perceived ethnicity was being from the community of Pentyrch whereas my perceived ethnicity was being from the community of Llantwit Fardre.

I plan to complain through the Public Service Ombudsman for Wales and potentially the Administrative Court for Wales. Acts like this might have been going on for 100s of years, but when they happen to me they are not tolerated regardless of whether or not others tolerated.

Alan Corkish

Alan Corkish blocked me on Facebook following me pointing out his bigotry in terms of those he considers “educated.”

Alan Corkish is abusive towards anyone who does not like the way he condemns those of faith, so is a good addition to my list of atheists I have been blocked by, which include Ricky Gervais and Richard Dawkins.

I set up Alan Corkish like a corker. According to him being educated includes have the bachelors, masters and doctoral degrees he has. So I showed Alan Corkish all my post-nominals and it was not long before he blocked me.

So many atheists suffer a neurosis where they claim to embody logic yet become scatty whenever one challenges them on their religious beliefs.

Science is not as certain as atheists would like to claim it is. As I explained to Alan Corkish, what is fact and fiction about black-holes changes almost daily, and so science is not stable as what is fact today is fiction tomorrow.

Baby Gard’s death is state-endorsed eugenics

Baby Gard’s death in my view amounts to state-endorsed eugenics.
The European Convention on Human Rights provides that the death penalty can be legal, providing it is made by the order of a court. In my view the UK courts have enacted this right by ordering the killing of Baby Gard without his parents’ consent.
My living will says that I wish to continue my EEG research should I ever be dependent on life support like Baby Gard was. It says I should stay on it until it is possible for me to be a candidate for cryonics.
Why should the parents of Baby Gard not have had the same right to decide his future, such as for him to take part in an experimental treatment which even if it was ineffective, would have helped advance science in a small way like I want to happen with me in the same situation?
The judicial killers of Baby Gard would likely have ruled that an adult who wanted to end their life by choice should not be assisted by doctors or anyone else. So why did the courts assist the killing of Baby Gard against his parents’ wishes?

Boots were wrong to give into radical feminists

I think it is disgraceful that Boots has caved into pressure from radical feminist MPs Jess Phillips and Stella Creasy by reducing the cost of the emergency contraceptive pill (ECP).
When a GP refused to give a former partner of mine an ECP we went the the pharmacist where it cost £20, just slightly less than what Boots are charging now. The reason it was £15 more than in France was because that paid for my former partner to have a private consultation with the pharmacist to make up her own might about whether the ECP was right for her.
This was the same at Boots – part of the charge was so those asking for the ECP could have a private consultation. They might as well change their sub-name from “the chemist” to “the drug store” if they are willing to drop the independent and impartial advice they give women just because a few fanatics choose to bully them.

Dr Daniel Cunliffe

Dr Daniel Cunliffe stopped me getting a PhD. Dr Daniel Cunliffe took a number of steps to stop me getting a PhD. He was cordial with me in person and by email when in reality behind my back he was saying he did not want to have any involvement with me. Dr Daniel Cunliffe is the scum of the earth and should be ashamed with himself for being so two-faced.

Professor David Brooksbank

Professor David Brooksbank stopped me getting a doctorate. Professor David Brooksbank led a campaign of harassment against me that culminated in Professor David Brooksbank getting my supervisory team to sign a change of enrolment form without my consent. Professor David Brooksbank had that form put to a committee and then thanked the secretary of that committee when it was accepted. Professor David Brooksbank is a scheming turd hole who should be ashamed to call himself an academic.